The Accidental Hedonist's Guide to:




My Book



99 Drams of Whiskey:The Accidental Hedonist's Quest for the Perfect Shot and the History of the Drink


Communication

The MonaVie Juice Scam

07/19/10, by Kate Hopkins Email 7994 views • Categories: Beverages

I try not to use the word "scam" lightly. After all, value is often determined by the buyer along with the seller, and if someone wishes to spend $35 on a bottle of juice, then it's not up to me to stop them.

Not to mention the fact that there are about 10,000 copies of a book out there that contains anecdotal evidence of me spending over $200 on two bottles of whiskey. So, yeah. To each their own.

With all of that being said, I can't help but feel a little skeevy looking at products from MonaVie.

"What is MonaVie?", some of you are asking. This is a good question. On the surface, they are little more than a Tupperware party that sells juice instead of plastic containers. That the suggested price of these bottles of juice run between $25 to $35 dollars for 24 ounces makes them a little more interesting to me.

What do these drinks provide in order for them to suggest such high numbers? From their website -

From powerful antioxidant support to joint, heart, and immune health, MonaVie’s body-beneficial products provide the nutrition you need for a healthy and active lifestyle.

...

Delivering a wide array of antioxidants, vitamins, and phytonutrients, as well as other beneficial ingredients like Wellmune®, plant-derived glucosamine, and plant sterols, every serving is guaranteed to be as efficacious as it is delicious.

In other words, they're supposed to be healthy. So healthy in fact, that it is suggested that the consumer of these juices should only drink 2 oz. at a time, twice a day (once in the morning, once in the evening). After all, one wouldn't want to drink too much health.

Moving beyond their market-speak, a quick look at the label of one of their products reveals what's within:

Proprietary blend of acai (freeze-dried powder and acai puree); fruit juice from concentrate (white grape, nashi pear, acerola, aronia, purple grape, cranberry, passion fruit, apricot, prune, kiwi, blueberry, wolfberry, pomegranate, lychee, camu camu); fruit puree (pear, banana, bilberry); citric acid, natural flavor, sodium benzoate (preservative), potassium sorbate (preservative).

And what are the benefits from this? Well, if the label is to be believed - 25% of your recommended daily allowance of Vitamin C, 12 of the RDA for Vitamin K, and 2% of Iron.

For a point of comparison, here's the ingredient list of a juice I drink often -

Purified Water, Organic Raspberry juice from concentrate, Organic Strawberry juice from concentrate, Citric Acid, Calcium, Potassium, Vitamin C, Magnesium, Vitamin E, Vitamin b-3, Zinc, Sucralose, Pantothenic Acid, Manganese, Vitamin B-6, Vitamin A, Vitamin B-2, Vitamin B-1, Vitamin D, Folic Acid, Biotin, Vitamin b-12

The benefits here? Well, take a look at the label yourself.

Granted, a great majority of the vitamins in the drink are water soluble, and won't last in anyone's system all that long and need to be replaced daily. Those are the 8 B vitamins and vitamin C.

Let me make it clear. I'm not saying that the juice I drink is healthy. I'm only suggesting that it is healthier than MonaVie.

Oh, and by the way? The cost for the juice drink above? $1.59. A far cry from the $35 that consumers of MonaVie are paying.

If you find my view suspect, let me quote Dr. Andrew Weil:

MonaVie is an expensive way to get your antioxidants - it sells for about $40 for a 25.3 ounce bottle. That works out to $4 to $6 per day if you use it as directed. While it is probably safe, I recommend sticking closer to home for your protective phytonutrients. Opt for organically grown blueberries, which are more available, much less expensive, and give you fiber as well as plenty of antioxidant activity. And don't forget black raspberries and pomegranates, both of which have health benefits for which there is good scientific evidence.

As for the glucosamine in some MonaVie products, there are less expensive ways to get that, too. If you have osteoarthritis, I think glucosamine is worth trying, and it may help restore damaged cartilage in joints. But buy a good brand of it and use the recommended dosage for a trial period - two months, say - to see if it helps. If you do not have osteoarthritis, you do not need glucosamine, nor do children need it.

So if MonaVie isn't actually selling a healthy drink, then what are they selling? Forbes Magazine lets us in on MonaVie's secret:

In the distributional art form known euphemistically as "multilevel marketing" and more crassly as a pyramid, a seller attempts to recruit other sellers, who recruit still others, and so on. Members get a percentage of revenues hauled in at some or all points below them in the pyramid, so those close to the top can do very well for themselves. The Direct Selling Association, a trade group, pegs the collective revenues of multilevel vendors at $30 billion in the U.S. and $111 billion worldwide. Exotic juices, nutritional supplements and cosmetics are among the favorites of the pyramid crowd.

Team is one step ahead of all these juice selling schemes. It is a pyramid atop a pyramid. It is selling motivational aids to help MonaVie vendors move the juice. But wait. If you can't earn back the $258 you've spent on the motivational lectures by selling $39 juice bottles, you could earn it back in another way--getting people to buy $258 motivational lectures. If you're good, you flog the lectures to other people, who sell them to yet others. Everybody gets rich. Everybody, that is, except the last round of buyers. That's the theory, anyway. The reality is that a mere 1% of Team members make any money from involvement with the firm.

In other words, it's a pyramid scheme. It's fruit juice in superior packaging. It's very likely a scam designed to make their president, one Mr. Dallin Larsen, wealthy.


Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Serene [Visitor] Email · http://www.momfoodproject.com
Thanks for the important post. There's no limit to the skeeviness of the "health food" industry.

Makes me want to put them in the sack: (Reference to the YouTube video VIaV8swc-fo )
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/10 @ 09:46
Comment from: Tex [Visitor] Email · http://thenetprofitgroup.yolasite.com
You didn't even touch on where the BIG money comes from. Many MV "leaders" came from Amway, and Amway has ripped off millions of people for several decades, to the tune of 10s of billions of dollars.

Read about it on this website: http://thenetprofitgroup.yolasite.com and forward the information to everyone you know, so they don't get scammed.

Amway is a scam, and here's why: Amway pays out as little money as they can get away with, so they support the higher level IBOs ripping off their downline via the tool scam.

As a result, about 99% of IBOs operate at a net loss, while the top 1% make several TIMES more from their Amway tool scam than from the Amway products. This was made illegal in the UK in 2008, but our FTC is unable to pull their heads out of their butts to stop it here.
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/10 @ 10:33
Comment from: astheroshe [Visitor] Email
I have tried MONA-Vie . It is not great, for the price or health benefits..but i know people who swear by it. To me you are better off eating Goji berries, or a nice acai puree. Blueberries, green tea..OH and here is one... How about SOME FRESH FRUIT and VEGGIES! That is our problem. We are always looking for something cool, new , and unusual.vs. the old tried and true. Plus, give it a fancy name and bottle it..and it is "winner winner chicken dinner""
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/10 @ 12:09
Comment from: Vogel [Visitor] Email
Excellent article Kate. Thanks!
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/10 @ 12:21
Comment from: mike [Visitor] Email
hilarious, sad, and all too true. why do people fall for this stuff? i've heard their pitch -- alluring to be sure -- yet common sense tells you to steer clear. if it looks like a pyramid scheme, smells like a pyramid scheme, and in this case tastes like one (!), then it probably is!!
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/10 @ 12:22
Comment from: Benjamin Frear [Visitor] Email · http://www.yoursmartcart.com/blog
True story. This sort of thing is actually very common. See Xocai "Healthy" Chocolate as another example of MLM-style profiteering from the new antioxidant craze.

One other way these companies make money: Most "members" of the MLM are required to buy a certain amount of the product every month. In theory, they're supposed to sell it. However, when that doesn't happen, they usually just eat/drink it themselves. In effect, they become customers.
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/10 @ 13:12
Comment from: Theo Wilson [Visitor] Email
No doubt, another Utah Mormon MLM scheme. Nobody does it like they and as much.
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/10 @ 15:26
Comment from: Anonymous Aussie [Visitor] Email
You certainly hit the nail on the head here, Kate - particularly in identifying the fact that this nutritionally void junk juice is nothing more than the laundered investment into the pyramid scam. Well done!
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/10 @ 15:41
Comment from: James Kohn [Visitor] Email · http://www.jameskohn.com
Every business form has it good and bad. Their are "evil" corporations (Enron, and more recently BP, come to mind), dubious franchises, and of course ethically challenged multi level marketing companies. Of course, one bad apple does NOT spoil the whole bunch, so each entity must be judged individually. If you're suspecting that I am a participant in a network marketing business, you'd be correct. As a successful business professional, I've seen them come and go, and in spite of being "recruited" constantly, I could never get past the stink of multi level marketing. I'm not here to plug my product, but I can say that I proudly provide it to many clients who use it happily. The difference, however, is that my clients can simply buy the product and use it as they see fit without having to be distributors. That would be the litmus test for me in evaluating a network marketing company going forward: does the product stand on it's own? In the case of Mona Vie, well, we've all read Kate's post. I only caution not to paint the entire MLM industry with one broad brush stroke. There are legitimate, ethical businesses and opportunites there, but it is incumbant on the indivdual to discern them.
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/10 @ 15:51
Comment from: MartyK [Visitor] Email
Kudos for writing this up. I shut down the all the frequent approaches of people touting some MLM offer that is "new" and "completely different" with the statement that "There is no such thing as Multi Level Marketing." There are however pyramid schemes with "products" attached to them to make the "legal." Of course the price of the product will be way out of proportion to actual costs to make the pyramid flow.
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/10 @ 16:09
Comment from: spanky [Visitor] Email
Is this place based out of Utah by chance?

Ah yes it is actually...We are the home to MLM in many forms...whether it be Noni, Nuskin, Usana, and a few others floating around. Those (utah) Mormons sure do love their MLM schemes. being an ex-mormon I can't tell you how many presentations I was apart of when I still belonged to the church. This is especially rampant in the Utah mormon...not the ones from out of state.

was it originally called Tahitian Noni?

Nope, but it does cost about the same with the same health benefits.
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/10 @ 16:34
Comment from: Ben [Visitor] Email
From all of the evidence I've read, it's better to just eat whole fruit. Juicing it removes all the good stuff (fiber + vitamins and other phytonutrients locked in that fiber). Might as well drink water and take a multivitamin at that point.
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/10 @ 17:53
Comment from: Lauren [Visitor] · http://www.shewritesla.com
Informative and bold post. You've highlighted just how complex and counter-intuitive the whole system is.
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/10 @ 20:20
Comment from: LB [Visitor] Email
If I want fruit juice, I juice fruit, it doesn't take that long and doesn't have all the rubbish in it. Costs a lot less too.
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 02:36
Comment from: humiliated [Visitor] Email
Excellent article Kate! Having been involved in this "business" (I am now rolling my eyes), I have first hand knowledge of the "indoctrination" methods. I was always skeptical, but I tell you, Mr. Larsen is the slimiest, slitheriest marketing person out there and he literally could sell snake oil to the masses! It is worth mentioning that the "company" is built on fundamental Christian principles which, I believe, gives Chrisitianity a bad name. He hopes people think...a devout Christian? He must be honest! It is disgusting the lengths he will go through, not to mention how offensive it is to us non-religious types.

Thank you again!
p.s. I wanna try some of that whiskey!

PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 06:45
Comment from: Susan @ SGCC [Visitor] Email · http://stickygooeycreamychewy.com
I couldn't agree with you more. The popularity of these MLM schemes boggles my mind. What is it about them that turns seemingly normal, rational people into bible-thumping, stark-raving hucksters with stars in their eyes? Are they really so gullible to think that they are going to hit the big time by selling exorbitantly priced, bad tasting fruit juice?

I have a family member who is "Monavie-ated". She puts every bit of energy that she has into pushing the product, at the expense of her kids and spouse. She has alienated almost everyone else in our family. She is all of a sudden devoutly religious and spends all day putting up obnoxious "personal testimonies" and religious quotes on Facebook. It's sad!

I think the worst offense is that many of these distributors will have you believe that the product is a cure-all for everything from cancer to heart disease to autism. I have seen some desperate people swilling that juice to save themselves. Disgusting! I'm not saying that the product doesn't have some health benefits. But curing cancer? Come on!

I believe that Monavie, as well as some of these other MLMs, are glorified cults. Their "business partners" appear to walk around in a brainwashed haze. Once reasonable individuals turn into insufferable clods. Just my opinion.

Sorry for the rant. I guess this post really hit a nerve with me.
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 07:44
Comment from: Nancy Hutchens [Visitor] Email
Just like social networking, MLM companies are a person-to-person business model. They are legal. (At a time no one trusts anyone, most of us trust a friend more than an company.) Pyramid schemes aren't legal! A MLM is a pyramid if a distributor needs to make a big investment in the product to distribute it; if 'owners' make money JUST FOR BRINGING IN DISTRIBUTORS--not product sales; if new distributors can never 'catch up' with the upline; if there is a huge difference in the wholesale and retail price to encourage customers to become distributors. Oprah blew the whistle on this company over a year ago.
But the other issue here is the product. I would never take a product without research DONE ON THE ACTUAL PRODUCT--NOT JUST THE VITAMINS IN IT at known research institutions, that meets AMA guidelines--done on people, double-blind, placebo, and reported in peer reviewed journals. Also, check out ConsumerLabs.com to see if a product is what is says it is. Many aren't! They recently did a column on the main ingredient in this product. Another factor is it has a lot of sugar which many health challenged people need to curtail.
As a cancer survivor, I use food supplements all the time and don't think I'd be alive otherwise, but use common sense and you'll sort the good from the bad.
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 08:44
Comment from: Calvin [Visitor] Email
What a weak argument against Monavie. Tell me Kate what proof have you added to this article that states that your Strawkey juice has any nutritional benefit at all?

Does your juice prove its benefits by peer-reviewed, double blind human testing like Monavie?

Has the results been published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry like Monavie's Acai?

http://nfscfaculty.tamu.edu/talcott/Commodities/A%C3%A7ai.htm

Dr. Steve Talcott joined the Scientific advisory board at Monavie. Does he get paid? Nope. Why did he join? Because he knows Monavie is the only ones who preserve the Acai in the proper manner to receieve all the benefits.

The patented freezed dried Acai (only used by Monavie) preserves the benefits and maintains the highest anti-oxidant score compared to any fruit ever found. (Only the freeze dried Acai is used in the third party clinical studies.)

That is why you don't have to drink gallons. 4 oz. is equivalent to 12-13 servings of fruits and vegetables. That is over 80 servings of fruit per bottle! Try and buy that many at a store for that price Kate.

Also it is a puree whole food not clarified or filtered like other juices. The vitamin count is hardly a measurement of value. Ever looked up how much Vitamin C there is in an orange? not much but the phytonutrients you receive from the whole juice is what makes it good. That is the same with Monavie's 19 fruits.

Are you saying that God is ripping us off when he created the Acai? What Monavie created is way to preserve this wonderful gem from the Amazon so that we can all enjoy it. Because if this the natives are picking the berries rather than tearing down the trees for soybean or cattle grazing.

At least Monavie backs up what it states with real science. Kate offer nothing but her opinion.

If you don't like Monavie don't drink it but at least offer some proof that you are qualifed to make a comment about it.
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 10:44
Comment from: Kate Hopkins [Member] Email · http://www.accidentalhedonist.com
Calvin,

From WebMD

"People eat acai berries to address various health conditions. But so far, acai berries have no known health benefit that’s any different than that of other similar fruits."

From the Mayo Clinic -

"Acai berries may be a good source of antioxidants, fiber and heart-healthy fats. But research on acai berries is limited, and claims about the health benefits of acai haven't been proved."

From Dr. Weil:

"University of Florida researcher Stephen Talcott, who has been investigating the antioxidant effects of the berry. He and colleagues have published findings from laboratory studies showing that extracts from acai berries caused leukemia cells to self-destruct. While Talcott cautioned that the study doesn't show that acai could prevent leukemia in humans, he noted that compounds that show good activity against cancer cells in cell cultures are likely to have beneficial effects in the body. Past research on other compounds has not shown this to be true, and in my mind, this is a big inferential leap that needs to be validated by further research."

....

"Acai may be rich in antioxidants, but that doesn't mean that high concentrations of those phytochemicals are making it from the berries into the juices, smoothies, etc. Until we know more about these products, I recommend sticking closer to home for your antioxidants..."

So Calvin, Please show me any...ANY research that supports the claims that Monavie is making.

Calvin wrote: "Are you saying that God is ripping us off when he created the Acai?"

Please don't put words in my mouth. But to address your point, I believe in science, and not god, and your logic here confuses me. By your argument, are we to conclude that you believe that God is trying to kill us when he created arsenic? Please.

My question to you Calvin? How much have you invested in Monavie?
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 11:21
Comment from: Calvin [Visitor] Email
I don't believe it! You write a hit piece on Monavie and you don't even bother to examine the scientific studies that support what Monavie shares? And now you want me to do your research for you?! What shoddy journalism. Look it up your self. You are the columnist.
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 12:19
Comment from: Kate Hopkins [Member] Email · http://www.accidentalhedonist.com
Calvin,

This is typical of people like you, i.e trolls. I have all of the evidence I need. I have unbiased reports that support my position on the acai . I have first hand product information comparing nutritional value between monavie and other juices. You have supplied...well, nothing. You know why? Because there are no unbiased scientific studies supporting Monavies claims. They don't exist.

So, thanks for playing.
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 12:36
Comment from: Kim [Visitor] Email
My husband got involved with a similar product called Vemma juice. Same product. Same pitch. He was sold a box at a "reduced" (HAH!) price so the seller could claim he was now a "wholesaler".

I did research into what the juices contained, and quickly came to the conclusion, as in this story, that there are many other, better, options, and at a fraction of the price.

The upshot is that the juice stinks, the little bottles are a joke, and they WILL NOT LEAVE US ALONE!!

As for Calvin's "you don't even bother to examine the scientific studies that support what Monavie shares?" Monavie isn't "sharing" anything other than a penchant for rapacious greed. If he likes his $200 per gallon juice, then fine, the rest of us just want to know what we;re getting into before jumping into that sort of expense - for $200, I would rather buy .....anything else!
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 13:00
Comment from: Calvin [Visitor] Email
I was going to write something insulting by why bring myself down to the Huffington standard.

You can write whatever you want Kate. It is a free country. However, I think that you have a responsbility to do more on the research end. You have a column which several people read. I don't.

Here is just one. There are many others. The rest is up to you.

http://www.aibmr.com/news/story.php?id=2

Also try the looking up the ingredient Wellmune which is in the newest Monavie drink, Mmun.
Checkout the research there and try to refute those studies.


Your favorite troll,
cal
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 13:41
Comment from: Susan [Visitor] Email
If you go read the actual study (J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol 56, No. 18, 2008), you will find that this was a rather small study (only 12 participants) on which to base such grandiose claims. Much more study is needed (as this study itself states.)
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 14:09
Comment from: Susan [Visitor] Email
Might not be good to take while you are pregnant:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20351708

"This report shows an association between MonaVie ingestion throughout pregnancy and prenatal DA closure resulting in cardiac dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension at birth."
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 14:47
Comment from: Kate Hopkins [Member] Email · http://www.accidentalhedonist.com
Did you even read the results of the report? Here are their conclusions (from here) - http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/jf8016157?prevSearch=monavie&searchHistoryKey=)

"In contrast, studies on polyphenols may be much more promising, and may be more relevant, as these types of antioxidants are the most abundant in a health-conscious diet (27-29). Given the high content of certain specific polyphenols in the JB, the increased antioxidant protection in vivo after consumption of the JB, and the anti-inflammatory capacity in vitro, further research is warranted to evaluate whether JB consumption may provide reversal of risk markers in subjects with conditions such as arthritis, obesity, chronic viral diseases, cardiovascular disease, and compromised cognitive function as well as other conditions associated with chronic inflammation."

In other words, it's the presence of the polyphenols which is important, polyphenols which are widely available in other cheaper, and readily available juices and other formats. There's nothing about Monavie which is any different from a glass of blueberry juice.

Additionally, as noted elsewhere, a study group of 12 people is not statistically significant. More testing on a wider sampling of people is needed.

And yeah, yeah, Wellmune. Do you even know what gluco polysaccharides do? Well first off, they don't exist. Polysaccharides do, of which there are a subset called Glycogen. Glycogen provides energy to those who do heavy exertions - long distance runners, forest fire fighters, cross-country skiers, all use some Glycogens the energy of last resort. Typical human beings don't need them, as we have plenty of energy already stored, often in the form of fat. What Wellmune is doing is providing fuel that won't ever be used by the great majority of us.

But energy isn't just what Wellmune is selling, is it? It's immunity. These would be supplied by the antigenic proteins associated with a layer of polysaccharides found on pathogenic bacteria. This is why they use yeast, for the bacteria. This would be an Exogenous antigen.

But the problem here is thus - The big study that Wellmune uses to support their immunology claim? They state "There were no significant differences in the incidence of symptomatic respiratory infections (SRIs) among the study groups. "

No significant differences. None. One person from the placebo group stayed home sick a few days. And that's the evidence Wellmune is using. (see here - http://www.wellmune.com/ColdFlustudyabstract.htm)

Here's a thought Calvin...provide evidence with real teeth, instead of studies that use small samplings, or are out and out failures.
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 15:23
Comment from: Lindsey [Visitor] Email
I'm with you on the MonaVie, but why does this article feature a picture of viso? Viso is available in so many stores for about $3/bottle, not $35! But again, totally with you on the MonaVie.
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/10 @ 23:24
Comment from: Rachel D [Visitor] Email
Removed by Author's request - Ed.
PermalinkPermalink 07/21/10 @ 08:12
Comment from: Paul [Visitor] Email · http://droppingtimber.com
I am not sure why you have a picture of a Viso bottle label in your post. Viso is a Portland, Oregon company that I think has zero involvement in this MLM scheme, other than maybe others using it to further their goal to bilk people out of their money. I see Viso available all around the Portland area for around $2 a bottle.
PermalinkPermalink 07/21/10 @ 16:33
Comment from: Bob Firestone [Visitor] Email · http://vegasbob.tumblr.com
I don't disagree that monavie is over priced and fails to deliver on most of the outrageous claims. To support those points in 2008 Mens Journal tested a number of juices including monavie and came to the conclusion that you can get better nutrition & anti-oxidants for less money. (http://www.mensjournal.com/superjuices-on-trial)

Where I do have issues is calling it a scam. Just because something is expensive doesn't make it a scam. There are plenty of expensive things that perform poorly relative to less expensive products.

The forbes article you site is mostly about how Orrin Woodward and Team make money with out actually selling monavie. The article should be on the opinion page because it doesn't site any industry experts it is nothing more than the reporters observations. If you were calling "Team" a scam that would be a lot more difficult to argue against.
PermalinkPermalink 07/21/10 @ 19:30
Comment from: Jacquie [Visitor] Email
Bravo Kate!! I am surprised to see this come up again. I guess old things are new again. About five years ago, this scam (I am calling it a SCAM) ripped through our fire department (a prime MLM environment) Every station had some knucklehead shilling free samples then offering "wholesale" pricing. What was sad was the smart ones jumped in first, then went quiet. Later, layer after layer of "Bro, let me hook you up" cycled. Tell them "No, Thanks." and you were harassed as a idiot and a fool. (Good Lord, let me bite my tongue before I lay into you) Finally, as this moronic fad finally quivered in its death throw. Finally, we could throw out the last moldering bottles into the garbage. The sickest part was the fights it caused between friends. While I am a huge fan of "word of mouth" marketing, I saw the MLM target friends and family, bulling them into buying a very dubious product. Bring a bottle in a fire house now and you will get laughed out of the building.
PermalinkPermalink 07/22/10 @ 12:25
Comment from: Westbound [Visitor] Email
45 grams of sugar in one serving of Strawkey? Your pancreas must hate you right about now.

Weil hates MLMs. You left that out of his quote.

PermalinkPermalink 07/30/10 @ 14:21
Comment from: Craig [Visitor] Email
MonaVie's elite sellers, those at the top of the 1% that actually make any money, are on record telling egregious lies about the product's healing powers. These are summed up well in the following court document:

http://www.amquix.info/pdfs/monavie/2-08-cv-00209-db-02.pdf

Everything from relieving stress to curing cancer has been attributed to this fruit juice. A cursory Google search reveals distributors making claims such as, "This stuff is real, it cures cancer and heart attacks. Please sign up to help live longer."

And a note to Westbound: Strawkey has 2.8 grams of sugar per oz., while MonaVie has 3 grams per oz. Also, Dr. Weil's opinion regarding MLM doesn't change his stated facts about the health benefits of MonaVie. To claim such is merely a circumstantial ad hominem argument.
PermalinkPermalink 08/04/10 @ 19:41
Comment from: J [Visitor] Email
More than likely this product is a scam just as many other products on the market today.

To Nancy and others who use Consumberlab.com I urge you to use caution with this company. A lot of Supplement Companies pay Consumerlabs.com to be listed. But whatever Consumerlabs.com finds out about a product, the results are proprietary of the Manufacturer(supplement company). Here is a link to read up on.

http://healthwyze.org/index.php/component/content/article/348-evaluating-the-e%20valuators-from-consumer-labs.html
PermalinkPermalink 08/09/10 @ 05:37
Comment from: Badger [Visitor] Email
@ Calvin - I have a peer reviewed study for you - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20351708.
PermalinkPermalink 08/09/10 @ 20:32
Comment from: Marianne Haargaard [Visitor] Email
Reading through all these comments and viciously aggressive statements I wonder if there are not more important things in some people's lives than shouting about a MLM company and its products. Criticising the company, its leadership and the fact that they're religious, its product, UTAH (?), the research! AND if I hear the word SCAM one more time I don't know what?! Is that an American thing? Just calm down, people!

The difference between a MLM business and a traditional business is that MLMs don't spend millions advertising and their products are not sitting on a shelf in shops and supermarkets. Instead they use word of mouth advertising / relationship marketing and pay their thousands of distributors commission. What is wrong with that?! OK, so you say that the product is expensive, - that's fine, nobody forces anybody to buy it, - let's leave it at that. Also MonaVie make no claims about the drink curing anything, - it is sold as a food, not a supplement. If such claims are made they are made by distributors which is wrong, and they will lose their distributorship if the company finds out about it. But there will always be people who will not play by he rules, as well as people who pester all their friends and family and end up losing both!

I'm not religious, I don't go to meetings, I don't pester anybody, I don't care if anybody wants to drink MonaVie or do the business, but I have been drinking MonaVie for around 18 months now, - I have always eaten healthily, taken supplements and exercised, but all the same I have been plagued with sinusitis, headaches, colds (and flus whenever they were around.), arthritis in my feet and knee, and it's all gone! I have more energy, sleep better and just feel great. This is worth a lot to me and also some of my friends who are now drinking it have felt huge benefits. AND again, to repeat myself, we are all people who eat healthily, lots of fruits and vegetables and supplements.

So please, - live and let live, we are all different, horses for courses and all that, - use your passion and energy for something good and positive instead.

OK, bring on the retaliation and hate comments! I live in the UK, so you can't get to me!
PermalinkPermalink 08/14/10 @ 08:28
Comment from: Craig [Visitor] Email
Poor Marianne Haargaard, people just won't stop revealing the facts of her beloved company.

It's deliciously ironic how she claims MonaVie makes no health claims and will punish its distributors if they do -- then she goes on to make unverifiable and unbelievable health claims! Five unrelated ailments, all cured with one magic juice!

And oh, MonaVie advises all its distributors to post their distributor license when posting online, but obviously they don't really care.
PermalinkPermalink 08/16/10 @ 05:54
Thanx for sharing all these yummy information here;)its toooooooo good.i just love it:)
PermalinkPermalink 08/25/10 @ 23:52
Comment from: Nicole B. [Visitor] Email
Kudos to Marianne and to using her full name. I am a science major and have read at least a hundred scientific journal articles, most of which in the last four months. When someone is making a claim which such harsh emotion involved, I don't tend to trust their opinion. Which again, is why the tone of Marianne's letter appealed to me. It is not emotional, yet she is clearly solid in her opinion and experience.

While knowing scientific literature and how studies come to be, I don't hold a lot of stock in statements that say further study must be done or health benefits haven't been proven. What it simply means is that for many, many reasons, including financial ones, not enough testing has been done and that there is nothing scientific to prove NOR disprove the hypothesis. In the health food industry, often times product ingredients cannot be patented and therefore are not lucrative enough to warrant scientific study from a financial standpoint.

None of this states that the benefits of acai are unsubstantiated. Sometimes, as with the Mediteranean diet, the best evidence is the overall health of a society in general. As with those who swear by Monavie's acai products, health benefits are individual and valuable in and of themselves to the consumer.

The antioxidants abundant in the acai berry have been scientifically shown beneficial to the human body. Not only that, but they often have wide-spread health benefits since free-radicals are harmful to cells in general because it is an electron and can therefore bond to innumerable organic compounds in the body. It stands to reason that this means that health benefits of antioxidants could be individual in nature.

Many of the devoted and knowledgeable proponents of health foods and supplements will confirm that one needs to be informed about the particular product used and the particular manufacturers quality standards in order to safely apply the substantiated benefits such as antioxidants. Any claims about health benefits are not legally allowed to be made, if you were to go into a health food store and read labels of many of the products it will simply tell you what is in it not what it does for your health. For that you need to ask or you need to learn it on your own. And since studies are very time consuming, very costly and do not make enough business sense since food cannot be patented, we are unlikely to ever truly know the scientific efficacy of health food products unless they are proven dangerous. That is something that can and has been proven.

Genetically modified foods are patentable and we have no ability to scientifically show that it is or isn't safe. In this case is assumed safe by some and assumed unsafe by others. Yet many times we do not have any idea if we are consuming these products.

My point is, that asking for scientific proof is a moot point. It means nothing. Not in this industry nor in the chemical industry. Take for example DDT. It was assumed safe and liberally sprayed in public. However, after awhile it was shown to be extremely hazardous to health. This is a man-made chemical. Acai berries have been eaten by Brazilians as it is in their natural habitat and they are a society in general that is known to have overall good health. Acai is in it's natural form and is not man-made.

This is my logical, unemotional argument.
PermalinkPermalink 08/31/10 @ 16:02

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
What color is a red balloon?