Poll

What Is your favorite type of Whisky/Whiskey?

View Results

Whiskey Book

First Draft - Research
100% complete

Second Draft
102% complete

Third Draft
99% complete

Food Snobbery: a response

06/26/07 @ 07:40:28 am, by Kate Hopkins Email 2997 views • Categories: Eat Local

Apparently Laura over at Starling Fitness didn't take kindly to my post yesterday about food and community. I got that impression when she entitled her post Food Snobbery.

Let's deal with her last paragraph first:

Try going hungry for a couple of days, Kate. Even “the food you deserve” will taste like a godsend after that.

Setting aside for the moment that this is a simple straw man argument (because of course that any food I eat after three days of hunger will seem like a godsend), explain to me exactly how eating at Applebee's or getting a loaf of Wonder Bread from Safeway helps the local farmers, the local economies, or even regional food diversity?

The answer is easy - it doesn't, regardless of how hungry I am.

Let me explain the simple economics of franchises. The dollar I spend at a franchise ends up somewhere else. If I eat at an Applebee's, my money spent there ends up in Overland Park, Kansas. If I buy my groceries at Safeway, my money eventually ends up in Pleasanton, California. Regardless of how wonderful these communities may or may not be, it benefits me in the long run if my dollars ends up in local banks here in Seattle where they can be reinvested into my local economy, instead of Kansas or California, where I'll see little to no local economic long term benefit.

Now, if a community decides it has no problem in letting a Starbucks (as an example) into the area, instead of investing their resources and later patronizing a local coffeehouse, that's a communities right. Just don't get angry when your money comes back into Seattle, making local upper management at the headquarters here all that more wealthy. Because one dollar spent at a Starbuck's is one less dollar spent at the local coffeehouse. Over time, what that means is that one less local business will exist, and one less chance of a local business person re-investing in the community that gave them their success.

This doesn't just happen with coffeehouses, but with restaurants, grocery stores, pharmacies, farms, etc, etc.

If the citizens of a community don't understand this basic concept, they're going to have less influence on the types of food found within the community. If they don't take the time and effort to change their infrastructure, then they will have to settle for what others from outside of the region determine which products should be sold into their community. And once those products are sold, their money will end up profiting a company hundreds, if not thousands of miles away.

Asheville, North Carolina is but one of many places in this country which are starting to understand this. They realize it's not just about the restaurants, but their entire food infrastructure, from farm to table and everything in between. They are getting a decent return on their investment with a diverse amount of restaurants and markets, and keeping many farmers and local entrepreneurs in business. They are getting the food culture they deserve.

Conversely, if a city is peppered with Chili's and TGIFriday's, and Albertson's and Safeways, and there's minimal to no effort being brought forth to change that, then they are getting the food culture they deserve as well.


Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Melissa [Visitor] Email
I don't know if that post even merits a response. First of all, the writer seems like the sort that would be happy if all food in the world was replaced by a synthesized Star Trek protein pill. Some people feel this way; they don't see food in the context of culture, ecology, or economics.

Second, I have a huge beef with people who write health blogs without credentials. One semester of biochemistry is all it takes to learn that all food is not equal and your body does not process an Applebees meal of chicken and potatoes the same way it would process wild salmon and fresh vegetables.

PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 08:23
Comment from: Z [Visitor] Email · http://waterboils.wordpress.com/
Just a few words for support:

I don't think she even understands what you meant in that post. She doesn't even get that the argument is not about "fancy" eating, but rather is about sustainable eating. She doesn't get that you are making a class conscious argument, ironically instead she thinks you are classist. What can you do in this position? Not much! As someone who gets confronted in this manner almost every day, all I can say is there is no way involving in a sane discussion with someone who comes from such a position. For her, we are a bunch of elitists, well because we chose to not eat food that she is OK with if we have the choice. They don't want to acknowledge the fact that the food we try not to eat (but they are fine with) destroys our lands, famishes our communities and contributes to racial/ethnic and class inequalities. If that is food snobbery, I guess I am happy to be a food snob.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 08:29
Comment from: Patrick [Visitor] Email
The fact that Laura regards food as serving no purpose other than to nourish you and then end up in the toilet indicates a massive disconnect between her approach and yours to the topic of food.

You two aren't just on different fields -- you're playing different sports.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 08:34
Comment from: Laura Moncur [Visitor] Email · http://www.starling-fitness.com/
The problem I have with your argument is an issue with scale.

AppleBees is a Kansas owned company. Is it alright to eat at AppleBees in Kansas, but not in SLC?

What makes the people in Kansas any less deserving of your money than the people in Seattle?

How many restaurants is too many? If a locally owned company opens a store in a different city are they suddenly evil? Is three restaurants too many? Fifteen? 100?

I find the vilification of companies just because they are successful to be a disturbing trend. And I'm sick of it.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 08:35
Comment from: Steamy Kitchen [Visitor] Email · http://www.steamykitchen.com
Laura might have an eating disorder or issues with food by the content of her blog. Lets not pick her her. Its not like she's some big fancy blogger or journalist...its just her personal blog and her personal opinion that she's putting out there.

But I do agree with supporting local businesses.

PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 08:36
Comment from: N [Visitor] Email
I think Laura has made some good points that have not been addressed. Instead she's been accused of lacking aesthetic sensibilities (Melissa) and being insane, or at least incapable of sane conversation (Z).

Speaking for myself, I think there's room for a cogent and succinct defense of the "locally grown food" position. I like food, like fresh veggies, etc., and when I feel like splurging I'll go ahead and pay the extra money for them. Occasionally, if I search industriously (i.e., if I have the time) and am lucky I can find both cheap and fresh/locally grown food, but not usually. For me, in other words, it's a trade-off between better quality vs cost (either money or time & effort).

The position expressed in this blog seems fundamentally opposed to my approach, because according to folks here it's not an issue of quality, but an issue of ethics. That's the part I don't see, and that's what I take Laura to be questioning. So I'd be interested in seeing some answers to here questions, and maybe some more:

Why are local farmers more deserving than farmers in Africa & South America who are struggling to find a cash crop to improve their local infrastructure, health care, etc?

Why must someone who's struggling to make ends meet and working two jobs spend all their money on locally grown and not have enough instead of buying the (perfectly fine, if not superb) veggies available at the supermarket?

In short, while I'm perfectly willing to accept that you're not trying to be classist, I think that there is a definitely classist element to your position. Even if you disagree with me, it's not "mising the point" to call your position classist, because one of the arguments against yours is that your position only works for those who have plenty of either money or time.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 10:08
Comment from: radish [Visitor] Email · http://www.sassyradish.com
I think that Laura is missing the point entirely - and I don't want to be mean, or rude, or knock her blog. I only read that one entry so I am not an expert on her eating issues or whatnot. While her arguments might hold water, her arguments as a response to Kate's thesis were not. They were random and emotionally driven. She could have taken her thoughts further. In any case, Kate never said that people in Seattle are less deserving of $ than people elsewhere. But there is a sound argument to be made for supporting local farming and food - it makes communities better and healthier. I agree with the guy/girl from waterboils comment - to Laura we are elitists/snobs, which is an incorrect perception, but one that Laura seems deeply committed to.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 10:10
Comment from: Z [Visitor] Email · http://waterboils.wordpress.com/
N asks: "Why are local farmers more deserving than farmers in Africa & South America who are struggling to find a cash crop to improve their local infrastructure, health care, etc?"

This is an important question, especially for an immigrant like me. I would love my home country to benefit from a global farm industry. However, the problem is that the farmers rarely benefit from exporting their produce to developed countries. There is so much waste that goes to overhead when you buy imported produce. Add, obnoxius gas emissions and empty transportation and middlemen costs it is a big pile of waste.

To keep competitive prices corporate farmers to pay much much less to the farmers, so that it is worth to pay for transportation costs. Not to mention destruction of crops to artificially manipulate the prices (Turkish nut, tea and tobacco farming is famous for this practice).

In other words, most of these farm industries are one way or another sweatshops; they rarely benefit the economies they exploit, except for the corporations that use them nobody wins.

The issue again goes into sustainability. As much as I know that some people are not as privileged to have similar options and opportunities as middle class food consumers, I also believe that in the end they end up being the ones who pay for the "low prices". Low price chain restaurants and big box groceries are not in accessible distance to lower income households. These institutions force people to drive (if they are lucky) or use public transportation to get their food. Ironically, statistically lower income individuals are the ones who have to travel more to get food and pay more for similar grocery items (i.e a lemon). For example, in African-American neigborhoods in Milwaukee some individuals have to take two buses to have access to basic food.

Besides, local food being expensive is proven to be a fallacy. Farmers market and CSA prices are systematically lower than grocery stores across the country. In other words, nobody has to go to Wholefoods to get local and organic produce; as long as there are people to support those farms and CSAs. Then we again come to the vicious circle.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 10:59
Comment from: Melissa [Visitor] Email
"Why are local farmers more deserving than farmers in Africa & South America who are struggling to find a cash crop to improve their local infrastructure, health care, etc?"

As a development economist, I think I should address this. Actually, I don't think she made good points. It was crass and hardly logical and I'm not sure why Kate bothered to respond. If you want an opposing view that is articulate see :http://conniff.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/06/13/dont-buy-local.

But the point of buying local things is
a. accountability to your community
Go to businesses you want to see around, no matter if they are local or not! I'm the first one to admit local doesn't always = better. The local grocery store here is horrendous and I'd rather shop at Trader Joes. But for restaurants, I'd say the local Bistro is a lot better for the community than Applebees.
b. The experience.
Buying local allows you to interact with other members of your community and learn about where your food comes from. Knowing your chefs and farmers adds a whole new dimension of knowledge to your everyday life.

There are other arguments, such as the food miles concept, but as an economist I think that is so complex that it should be secondary . In many cases, even when fossil fuel costs are factored in, imported food can be more sustainable.

I don't always buy local though. The wonder of trade is that it allows us to chose from a huge variety of products. Chocolate, kiwis, and mangos are not going to be grown in Illinois any time soon. They are also the type of labor intensive specialty goods that can drive growth in developing countries. I do have concerns relating to the safety of some imported products, but I think third-party certification has come a long way in alleviating these concerns by fostering "attribute" agriculture: fair trade, organic, etc. that insures phytosanitary safety and that at least some money is going to the farmers.

As an economist, I recognize the power of the consumer in voting with the dollar. Where and how you eat matters.

PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 11:00
Comment from: Kate Hopkins [Member] Email · http://www.accidentalhedonist.com
N,

I think that the main point of the argument is being missed, as my position is based on neither quality nor ethics, but that of economics.

Laura,

You asked "What makes the people in Kansas any less deserving of your money than the people in Seattle?"

Simple...The consumers in Seattle have less influence upon the decisions made in Kansas, than they do upon most of the food businesses based in their local area.

Conversely, decisions made in the corporate board rooms rarely take into consideration the needs or desires of a specific regions.

If Applebee's can expand the local economy beyond that of the service industry, and still provide quality food, then by all means, let them be part of the equation.

But they don't do that. They buy marginal foods from places outside of the local region. How does that benefit the local region?
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 11:27
Comment from: john patrick [Visitor] Email · http://jpv206.blogspot.com
I want to pat Kate on the head and tell her, “It’s just food, honey. It all comes out smelling poorly in the end.”

Food is meant to keep me from passing out from hunger and low blood sugar. When I feel dizzy and hungry, Applebee’s works just as well as some snooty restaurant."


Why on earth would anyone take health and diet advice from this person? What a joke.

PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 12:44
Comment from: john patrick [Visitor] Email · http://jpv206.blogspot.com
Grr, I can't let this go.

Applebee's doesn't make the Soul Burger (Silver Fork), Mulitas de adobada (El asadero), or Ants On a Log (老四川 Sichuanese Cuisine)...

Is Applebee's ever going to make this food? No.

But of course, we weren't really thinking about the minority business community were we? There was an assumption made that this was a classist argument, based on snootly local, slow-food, food snobs.

Brace yourselves, white people: local food is YOUR cultural heritage. Yes. YES! Do you really want to sell it to Applebee's?

And if your growing up/raising kids in Seattle the minority-owned ethnic restaurants are YOUR cultural heritage as well. Because the richness of our culinary diversity belongs to you as well.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 13:21
Comment from: Dave [Visitor] Email · http://www.thelifeledger.com
Laura :

(For disclosure, I'm from Asheville originally and go back a few times a year to visit family)

Actually, if what you posted here is your issue, then the difference is easy enough to explain. What is talked about here is not vilification of companies but experiencing the local culture, whatever that is.

Walk into a AppleBees, McD's, or any other chain/franchised restaurant and you will get the same food. That's part of the appeal/concept. No matter where you go, you can have that piece of familiarity. By doing this you set yourself apart from where you visit. Which may or may not be important to you, which is fine.

You kinda remind me of a friend who went to Florence, Italy. He stopped at a McD's for a bacon cheese burger and was grossed out. They made it w/ Procuito ?sp? instead of real bacon. Heck he thought all the food over there was horrid, such as the pasta being under cooked. On the flip side, when I went there for my honeymoon I had a complete opposite experience. Wonderful food at smaller places, only one bad meal the entire time. And yes that was at the one American chain we ate at.

And there is an important difference in what you are looking for. Some days I'm just like you - All I want is that caloric intake so I can keep doing what I'm doing. Usually that entails Taco Bell bean burritos to my wife's eternal sadness. Other times I want to enjoy what I'm eating, just like I would enjoy a good book or lazy Sunday walk. You prioritize what you need as you need.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 13:45
Comment from: FenTiger [Visitor] Email
"It's just food..."

Perhaps it IS just food. BUT...the food that is served by my locally owned cafe/bistro/diner/what-have-you is much more likely to have actually been prepared and cooked onsite using fresh (and sometimes locally grown) ingredients. If I go to Applebees or one of the other cookie-cutter chains, it's quite likely that what I'll be served was pulled from the deep freeze and ripped out of a cardboard box. Odds are that it's full of sodium, and there's a strong chance that it also contains such delicious ingredients as high-fructose corn syrup.

So yes, perhaps it is just food, but I think I'm worth a little more than "just food." I want something that tastes good and hasn't been processed to death, frozen, and trucked halfway across the country to be tossed at me by a "server" who's been told to push the appetizers and/or desserts, as well as the overpriced "feature" menu.

Does this make me a food snob? Perhaps it does - but then I've never been one who is particularly interested in what other people think. I know what I like, and I'm not willing to settle for anything less.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 13:53
Comment from: Dave [Visitor] Email · http://www.thelifeledger.com
As for Asheville itself...

I will say that if Kate was hopping half as much as it indicates, its very understandable why she didnt see the standard stuff. Most of it is right off the highway, just like in any other city, or in the ever growing parts of the sub-burbs. The downtown has been pushing for major revitalization for years in all sorts of culture ways (food included) to both effect and benefit from tourism, which is what she indicated. Before .... either the Great Depression or WW2 it was apparently one hell of a resort town.

And Asheville has an extremely mixed cultures.

The arts and crafts as well as "folk" scene are highly encouraged to tag the people as they come thru. And yes that includes the hippy style mentality, for better and worse. A walk down .... river in Biltmore. Lots of artisans selling all sorts of wares.

At the same time, its becoming the new Florida believe it or not. People who hate the cold first move to Florida, learn to hate the heat, and move somewhere in btwn - be it Asheville if you love mountains, Wilmington for the beach or RDU for somewhere in the middle. So wisely the local government trys to encourage places that will make Asheville stand out.

Some of the people who move in, also do it as vacation homes. I can take you to about 3 dirt jeep roads that dead end into massive gate, w/ multi million dollar homes behind it. How do you get in? The helipad of course.

Also, there is the Biltmore Estate. You may not think much about that, but it does hold sway. Across the street from the main entrance, a McD's was put in. A few years later, it was torn down and rebuilt into one of the most -amazing- McD's I've ever seen. Puts some higher class places I've seen to shame.

And there are the locals. Good solid, Salt of the Earth, country folk who live up to about an hour out. Asheville is the hub for them to come and do most anything be it shopping or whatever.

Asheville is a hell of a mix. And I don't think that most people who live there would change if for the world.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 13:59
Comment from: john patrick [Visitor] Email · http://jpv206.blogspot.com
I just can't believe she posted online that she wants to pat your head and tell you about poop.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 14:00
Comment from: tut-tut [Visitor] Email · http://inside-the-shell.blogspot.com
Point Laura to Barbara Kingsolver's very readable, very good Animal, Vegetable, Miracle. She and her husband and daughter explain very gently and clearly why we need to be much more cognizant about eating, buying, and so spending locally. We need to support our communities.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 14:30
Comment from: raquel [Visitor] Email
right on sista'!!!

i left her a comment as well. seems she may have stirred her own pot... :)
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 14:36
Comment from: Linda [Visitor] Email · http://www.leendaluuwitsend.blogspot..com
Supporting local industries and farms is essential but the argument for local eating extends also to food safety. If I buy a pound of ground beef from my neighbor's farm, it's got one cow's muscle in that ground beef. If I buy a frozen patty made in a factory in Omaha (merely an illustration, I have nothing against Omaha), that patty may have a hundred cows in it, which really increases my chances for getting a little E.coli with it. Or if you a vegetarian, think about bagged lettuce. One bag comes from many, many fields and so contamination in one field is not limited to one or two heads, it's 'wealth' is spread among all the bags that field's lettuce goes into (read: outbreak). If I buy a contaminated head from my neighbor's farm, chances are it only infects me, not 100.

Buy local. Your health and the health of your community depend upon it.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 15:56
Comment from: john patrick 吉平 [Visitor] Email · http://jpv206.blogspot.com
Of course, I'm always taking the ethnic angle. My thoughts, as well as a picture of my lunch are over on my blog.

It's a Soul Burger!!! from Silver Fork on Rainier. Maybe it's not locally grown, but it's locally owned, and it's something Applebee's would never serve me.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 17:23
Comment from: Brad Thompson [Visitor] Email
Bravo. I would have been tempted to ignore Laura's post, but you've addressed it very well.

Incidentally, I just tried to chime in on her comments, but she's gone and closed comments for her misguided post. Below is what I've sent her via email:

-----

Laura --

I wish I could leave a comment on your blog! It was an interesting post, and public discussion is what makes them interesting. Please turn comments back on!

A food snob is someone who takes interest in their food and considers it to be something more than fuel, getting all worked up and obsessed with what is simply a biological function. Right.

Oh dear..by that definition, I think I might be one of those.

I must also confess to being a sexual snob, because I consider sex and intimacy to be part of a healthy and rich romantic life, instead of the simple mechanical means of procreation.

Oh my. I'm also a music snob, because for many years of my deviant life, I've developed preferences for music by artists with personal relevance to my life, and I haven't been content to consume the most digestible and readily-available background pop sounds on the radio.

Would you believe it? I'm also a travel snob. I'm not content to spend my life in my own city, where I could have a perfectly good life until I die. I've devoted a lot of my time and money to going away to foreign countries, when I could just stay at home, where I'll eventually end up rotting in the ground in a few decades anyway, much like my food.

I am obviously afflicted with some serious self-righteousness, and I'm afraid it might be terminal.

Thanks for clearing this issue up, Laura. You've done us all a great and enlightening service.

- Brad
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 17:49
Comment from: john patrick 吉平 [Visitor] Email · http://jpv206.blogspot.com
She got the last word on her comments by closing it off, calling us food snobs, and telling us to stop getting our self esteem from our food. Head, firmly planted in sand.

I don't know why we deserve this abuse just because we want to patronize local interests instead of Applebee's.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/07 @ 21:42
Comment from: La Dolce Vita [Visitor] Email
"Food is meant to keep me from passing out from hunger and low blood sugar. When I feel dizzy and hungry, Applebee’s works just as well as some snooty restaurant."

It is shocking to read that someone living in a country not threatened by famine would voluntarily reduce her lifestyle to the most primitive functions. What an abject life where pleasure is not even factored in.
PermalinkPermalink 06/27/07 @ 04:59
Comment from: Simon [Visitor] Email · http://grubnoise.wordpress.com
I understand that she thinks food is simply nutrients, her relation with food is much more grounded on the physiological aspects of it than most of us, but her lack of comprehension of simple economics is sad.
PermalinkPermalink 06/27/07 @ 05:11
Comment from: Will [Visitor] Email
Laura:

While I in no way want to encourage people to dine at the world's Appleby's or their chain-store brethren, it's worth noting that not every dollar you spend at one of those restaurants goes back to a faraway corporate bank vault. Waiters and waitresses and busboys and cooks who work their tails off in soul-sucking corporate jobs take home some of that money to feed their families and to spend what little is left in your own local community.
PermalinkPermalink 06/27/07 @ 06:44
Comment from: Will [Visitor] Email
Laura:

While I in no way want to encourage people to dine at the world's Appleby's or their chain-store brethren, it's worth noting that not every dollar you spend at one of those restaurants goes back to a faraway corporate bank vault. Waiters and waitresses and busboys and cooks who work their tails off in soul-sucking corporate jobs take home some of that money to feed their families and to spend what little is left in your own local community. Let's support local businesses, but paint with too broad a brush.
PermalinkPermalink 06/27/07 @ 06:46
Comment from: Steamy Kitchen [Visitor] Email · http://www.steamykitchen.com
After reading all of this and really thinking hard the past few days about this whole topic, I can see a different point of view. I do shop locally and support small restaurants; however; I have the money and the time to do so.

When you are penny-pinching, juggling 3 kids' schedules, work and just trying to survive your crazy day-to-day schedule...sometimes the neon Walmart or McDonald's sign is comfort.

1) because what you find is consistency at those chains.

2) cheap, you can afford it.

3) one-stop shop (Applebees has something that would appeal to every one in your family; You can get detergent and broccoli at Walmart)

Sometimes, I can visit my farmers market and find produce cheaper than at the supermarkets....but thats not all of the time.

Sometimes, I can get a better chicken parm at a better price at the local italian place...but thats not all of the time.

If I have only $X of money to spread around to feed my family in X amount of time tonight...I'm just looking to feed my family and survive to the next day and to the next paycheck.

While most people would say they support local economy - it may be a little further down on the list of priorities for others.

PermalinkPermalink 06/27/07 @ 07:50
Comment from: rachel [Visitor] Email · http://coconutlime.blogspot.com
We have some good local eating here in Baltimore:
http://foodmaven.blogspot.com/2007/06/eating-locally-dogwood-deli.html
PermalinkPermalink 06/27/07 @ 13:14
Comment from: with whipped cream on top [Visitor] Email
Please keep in mind that chain restaurants are often run by local businessmen and women who hire local employees. They also often use local suppliers if those suppliers are available (and can meet the demands of said chain restaurants). I know of one chain, specifically, where I can go in, order a variety of items and know that those items come from right here in my own state. You just have to do a little research.

Also, I know of many local restaurants that use non-local suppliers (Fresh Express lettuce, beef and chicken that are not raised locally and not even packaged locally), so you can't just make assumptions. Eat local whenever you can, but remember that not all chains are evil.

p.s. I personally wouldn't eat at Applebee's because it's bland and boring. And all the kids screaming everywhere? Give me a break!
PermalinkPermalink 06/27/07 @ 13:56
Comment from: Brad [Visitor] Email
Laura's a food blogger too -- her personal blog has an instructional cooking video.

http://laura.moncur.org/archives/2007/06/22/how-to-make-a-grilled-cheese-sandwich/
PermalinkPermalink 06/28/07 @ 07:57
Comment from: Coyote [Visitor] Email
Grow your own food. If you don't have land, take some. It's called guerilla gardening. Then you can share the food for free and not support the whole master/slave, worker/boss relationship. Heck, free food means you get to work less, too.
PermalinkPermalink 06/28/07 @ 09:58
Comment from: chefjp [Visitor] Email · http://www.hellchef.com/foodblog
Howdy--I agree with you. From my own personal experience of owning a small independent restaurant down the road from an Applebee's and an Outback Steak House, these franchise joints have a deadly impact on local economy. Thanks for a great blog post, chefjp
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/07 @ 11:11
Comment from: Fatemeh [Visitor] Email · http://www.gastronomie-sf.com
Y'all missed a couple of choice posts:

http://www.starling-fitness.com/archives/2007/06/10/pick-a-hood/
This post talks about how pissed she is about Nike's Run Like New York campaign. She's pissed because she wants to "Run for SLC". Huh?

http://www.starling-fitness.com/archives/2007/06/23/alli-is-here/">
Over here, it turns out that she's thinking about a weight-loss drug while she's -- wait for it -- waiting for her McNuggets and coke.

The irony of all of this sent me reeling.

Look, I'm not the most "local" eater, and I've been known to succumb to a chain from time to time. (What, what?? Those In N Out burgers are GOOD!)

But at least I am aware of what I'm putting in my body and don't look to a global conglomerate (like Weight Watchers) to reaffirm my choice of fried chickeny nuggets from a drive-through window because they are within the acceptable "point" range, irrespective of the actual QUALITY of the food.

Sad. Just... sad.
PermalinkPermalink 07/02/07 @ 09:57
Comment from: Annie [Visitor] Email
Even when good points are made here, I can't help being mad at the way they were put out. Grow up. Some of the things that were said, as logical as they are, just made me sick by the violence of the personal attack they represent. It's like US bombarding Korea, not fair at all. And I really wish the person who made fun about eating disorder has trouble sleeping at night. No one, and I mean no one, should kid around with that.

Although I agree that buying local doesn't make a food snob. Those kind of replies (or the tone of some of them anyway) definitly denotes overall snobism. There are some people on here I defenitly never would want to meet and am glad I never will have to.
PermalinkPermalink 07/04/07 @ 16:10

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
What color is a red balloon?

AH Food Journals