Poll

What Is your favorite type of Whisky/Whiskey?

View Results

Whiskey Book

First Draft - Research
100% complete

Second Draft
102% complete

Third Draft
99% complete

Michael Pollan on Foie Gras

06/01/06 @ 06:57:16 am, by Kate Hopkins Email 815 views • Categories: Foie Gras

Okay, okay, I'm going a little bit overboard on Michael Pollan of late, but the dude is on top of his game. It also helps that he and I share the same brain on several topics.

On his New York Times Blog (hidden behind a login screen that one must pay for), he makes the following statement on the recent Chicago Foie Gran ban:

I’m not about to defend foie gras from the legions of righteous animal defenders. But do we have any reason to believe that feeding ducks and geese corn through tubes put down their throats is any more brutal than snipping off tails and beaks? I have not visited either of America’s foie gras farms, but I note that they have invited journalists to visit and see the operations for themselves. (Just try to wangle your way into an industrial chicken or hog facility.) Some of the journalists who have accepted that invitation report that the birds rush over to the farmers at feeding time. Our own visceral revulsion at the prospect of having tubes stuck down our throats may have to do with the fact we have a gag reflex; ducks and geese do not. I seriously doubt you’d ever see pigs rushing over to the man wielding the pliers.

To ban foie gras is symbolic politics at its worst, a way to create the appearance of doing something about a problem that politicians — and, let’s face it, most of us eaters — would rather not confront. So we close down a couple of foie gras farms. (Though the California law gives the farmers till 2012 to desist, which is odd: if force-feeding ducks is really so heinous, then how in good conscience can we abide the practice for six more years?) We brace ourselves for a major change in our eating habits: no more foie gras after 2012. What a sacrifice! And, after patting ourselves on the back for all we’ve done for the animals, we can now, with clear conscience, turn back to our breakfast, ordering bacon and eggs, sunny side up.

The hypocrisy behind the Foie Gras ban is something that the folks at PETA seem to be unwilling to address. Chicago, home of Armour meats, would have been the perfect place to confront some of the issues that are worth bringing into the public discourse. Instead, they chose to attack a small farm producer that's trying to be as transparent as possible.

(Thanks Jack!)

Technorati Tags: , , ,


Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: haddock [Visitor] · http://knifesedge.typepad.com
A little additional info about the CA ban. It was heavily endorsed by one of the foie farms here who had already decided to move their operations to Nevada. By getting the legislature to ban production after 2012 they essentially guaranteed nearly 7 years of minimal competition, and when the ban is in place they will be in Nevada.
PermalinkPermalink 06/01/06 @ 10:38
Comment from: Amy [Visitor] · http://www.cookingwithamy.com
American foie gras producers are few and their customers are few, and consumers are few and therefore make for a much easier target than the big producers of say chickens or pigs. Always easier to pick to on the little guys, isn't it?
PermalinkPermalink 06/01/06 @ 11:10
Comment from: Dr. Vino [Visitor] · http://drvino.blogspot.com
1. there's actually a producer of foie gras in the Hudson Valley, so make that three producers.

2. You might be interested in this open letter, Kate and others, from the Whole Foods CEO to Pollan:

http://www.wholefoods.com/blogs/jm/archives/2006/05/an_open_letter_1.html
PermalinkPermalink 06/01/06 @ 12:51
Comment from: Ben [Visitor] · http://bengarland.com
He does have a way with words, doesn't he? Too bad his blog is hidden behind the NYT paywall... I'd subscribe but it's like $10 a month or something ridiculous. I get real magazines delivered to my mailbox for less than that.

I thought the whole point of blogs was to be, you know, free?
PermalinkPermalink 06/01/06 @ 16:22
Comment from: cynthia [Visitor] · http://www.foodmigration.com
Wow, thanks for republishing that, Kate. "Symbolic politics at its worst" - wish I could have expressed my views on this topic as well as he has.
PermalinkPermalink 06/06/06 @ 09:18
Comment from: Ricardo Rabago [Visitor] · http://OrganicallySpeaking.org/
If interested Organically Speaking has released an audio conversation with Michael Pollan, The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals.

We our introducing a new audio comment system today, you can now leave an audio comment on any of our posts. You will find an “Insert Audio Comment” link at the bottom of the usual “Add Comment” space. All you need is a microphone!

Try it out and let Michael and John know what you think about the show!

http://OrganicallySpeaking.org/

All the best,
-Ricardo
PermalinkPermalink 07/24/06 @ 04:46

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
What color is a red balloon?

AH Food Journals