Poll

What was your favorite Breakfast Cereal as a child?

View Results

Whiskey Book

First Draft - Research
100% complete

Second Draft
102% complete

Third Draft
99% complete

We Get Letters v. 21: The Case against Coca-Cola

01/31/06 @ 06:00:00 am, by Kate Hopkins Email 3031 views • Categories: Non Alcoholic, We Get Letters, Food Politics

Langley writes in:

Kate,

Can you please help me build a case against drinking Coke? My husband LOVES the fizzy, sweet, goodness of it and drinks up to two cans a day.

It is worth mentioning before I go any further, that overall we lead a very healthy lifestyle, so Coke is really his only vice - but I'd really love him to cut back!

I have tried to tell him over and over again how bad it is for him, how it will rot his teeth, but he's just not prepared to give it up or cut down.

Anything facts or figures you could provide me on the health hazards of drinking coke would be most appreciated.

Cheers,
Langley

Hi Langley, and thanks for the question and comments. However, after reading the following, I'm not sure your going to feel so gracious in return.

I could easily lay out a case against Coca-Cola and give a variety of health concerns, and I will a little further down below, but I want to address a larger issue.

First and foremost, I am a strong believer in personal responsibility. If a person has enough data to make an informed decision, then I try to respect that person's choice. If a person likes McDonald's, Kraft Mac & Cheese, or even Coca-Cola, more power to them.

The corporations on the other hand, these purveyors of misinformation and setters of inflated expectations, I have no problem taking a whack at now and then. If a company gives enough information for the consumer to make a decision, then they deserve our respect. If a company goes out of their way to mislead or hide information from the consumer, then I have a problem.

But back to your husband: The case against carbonated sodas is pretty straight forward. They're empty calories and add little or nothing of nutrional value. Replacing two 12-ounce cans of sugar sweetened soda with water can cut over 350 calories per day. Over the course of a month, that equates to 10500 calories or about 3 lbs, if your to believe the numbers on this site. Multiply that by 12 and that's 36 pounds saved in year. Not too shabby.

Then there's the carbonic and phosphoric acids found in the sodas which don't help a person's teeth, and of course the High Fructose Corn Syrup, which nobody knows how it affects the majority of the population. Even if you go the cane sugar route, excessive sugar intake may cause endogenous opioid dependency (in english: a body becomes "addicted" to sugar), which possibly leads to higher insulin production, obesity and Type II diabetes.

Have I scared you yet? My apologies, because here's some good news. Firstly, the acid versus the tooth enamel issue may not exist. The American Academy of Pediatric Dentristy found that the pH associated with Coke and Diet Coke did not reach the critical pH which is expected for enamel demineralization and dissolution. Whether you believe their results or not is probably best determined on whether your belief that Coke's $1,000,000 grant to the AAPD biased their results.

The obesity and diabetes doesn't happen to everyone who drinks soda. In fact, it doesn't even happen to a great majority of people who are overweight. It does happen, don't get me wrong. Enough so, that it's statisically siginificant in to those who work in the health industry. But if your husband visits his doctors and dentists on a regular basis, and they find him to be healthy, then he needn't worry about the above. However, if they suggest he cut back, then the above links should help give him reasons to stop drinking.

There's so many other reasons not to drink Coke that have nothing to do with health, inlcuding giving huge grants to medical associations to prove that Coke doesn't rot teeth. I realize this is a generalization, but it's often true: a corporation that gives money for research often does so to muddy the debate on their products.

Then there's the recent episodes surrounding Coke and its bottlers tolerating the actions of Columbian paramilitaries against their workers in order to prevent them from setting up trade unions, resulting in some of the leaders of said attempted trade unions being murdered.

This has lead to several universities to banning Coke from their campus.

You see, there are many for your husband not to drink Coke. Health is only one of them.

Technorati Tags: , , ,


Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Marc [Visitor] · http://marcsala.blogspot.com/
There is also the issue of the use of local water resources to make Coca-Cola. The documentary Thirst (possibly available in video stores) described how multinatinal corporations in India and other places are somehow obtaining water rights in poor villages and pumping the reserviors and aquifers dry to make Coke and bottled water.

The 2nd segment of 03/16/03 edition of To the Best of Our Knowledge for an interview with the authors of "Blue Gold: The Fight to Stop the Corporate Theft of the World's Water."
PermalinkPermalink 01/31/06 @ 08:32
Comment from: Barbara Fisher [Visitor] · http://www.tigersandstrawberries.com/
Another thing that phosphoric acid may cause is lower bone density, which affects both men and women. It leaches calcium out of bones, and causes middle aged men to exhibit signs of osteoperosis--a disease which used to primarily affect elderly women.

I found that out when I was researching chemical additives in organic foods.

I can also add this--when I stopped drinking Coke habitually, I lost three dress sizes. In a year. Just an FYI--those thirty six pounds that Kate quoted are a real statistic--not just numbers on the screen. I have experienced it.
PermalinkPermalink 01/31/06 @ 10:39
Comment from: wintermute [Visitor] · http://wmute.livejournal.com
> The American Academy of Pediatric Dentristy found that the pH associated with Coke and Diet Coke did not reach the critical pH which is expected for enamel demineralization and dissolution. Whether you believe their results or not is probably best determined on whether your belief that Coke's $1,000,000 grant to the AAPD biased their results.

I have often heard the story that Coke dissolves tooth enamal; being a precocious child, I forwent giving one of my baby teeth to the tooth fairy, and instead put it in a glass of Coke. A week later, there had been no noticable effect, and I got bored with the experiment, concluding that Coca-Cola would not rot my teeth.

Neither Coca-Cola nor any other soft drink company provided any aid for this experiment.

Snopes seem to have come to much the same conclusion: http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/tooth.asp

I have also often wondered why this same claim is never made against orange juice. After all, it's more than twice as acidic, but apparently will never harm your teeth. It's a funny old world, isn't it?
PermalinkPermalink 01/31/06 @ 10:44
Comment from: cybele [Visitor] · http://www.typetive.com/candyblog
I agree with the empty calories argument.

I've never had a soda habit (I like my sweets in solid form), but my husband used to drink it quite a bit (never at home, just when he was out). By eliminating it he lost about 10 pounds in three months. Now when he wants a bit of fizzy he puts some Pelligrino water in his fresh squeezed orange juice.
PermalinkPermalink 01/31/06 @ 10:45
Comment from: Jack [Member] Email · http://www.ForkandBottle.com
Great post!
PermalinkPermalink 01/31/06 @ 13:04
Comment from: Andrew Bell [Visitor]
Why not play the elitist card and point out that Coke only piques unsophisticated palates? There is simply no depth to these fizzy sugar waters.

If your husband wants to drink the grog of pimpled teens and Nascar-goers, then he ought to be reminded of the company he's keeping at all times.

I occasionally buy ginger-ale for my fix and I believe you might be able to ween him off Coke with such a beverage.

Shame is a powerful tool.
PermalinkPermalink 01/31/06 @ 15:56
Comment from: MJN [Visitor] · http://www.hungrymag.com
Be thankful your husband doesn't have a Hot Pockets addiction. The processed meat in those things is unnatural.
PermalinkPermalink 01/31/06 @ 22:24
Comment from: richard [Visitor]
Does anybody know anything about whether diet Coke is rally more healthy than regular sugary Coke???
PermalinkPermalink 02/04/06 @ 09:32
Comment from: Tana [Visitor] · http://smallfarms.typepad.com
Another hilarious irony is that when Coca-Cola was first around, in 1886, it was billed as "an esteemed brain tonic and intellectual beverage." Au contraire, huh?
PermalinkPermalink 02/13/06 @ 10:39
Comment from: Tana [Visitor] · http://smallfarms.typepad.com
One additional comment to answer Richard's question. It isn't which is healthier, really, is it? Isn't it more truthful to say "which is more toxic"? There is nothing healthy about drinking a glassful of chemicals. There is nothing real about Coca-Cola.

[/end soapbox rant]
PermalinkPermalink 02/13/06 @ 10:41
Comment from: Stuart [Visitor]
Interesting quote from Tana: "There is nothing healthy about drinking a glassful of chemicals". I just love it when people who are ignorant of science make fools of themsleves like that. ANY glass of ANY liquid that you drink is, in reality, a "glassful of chemicals". Even the purest, cleanest, most filtered, totally immaculate distilled water is, of course, a chemical... In fact, the entire universe is, of course, made up of nothing at all but chemicals and energy...
PermalinkPermalink 05/09/06 @ 21:27

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
What color is a red balloon?