Poll

What was your favorite Breakfast Cereal as a child?

View Results

Whiskey Book

First Draft - Research
100% complete

Second Draft
102% complete

Third Draft
99% complete

The USDA Blues

01/19/06 @ 01:15:00 pm, by Kate Hopkins Email 574 views • Categories: Food News, Food Politics

Y'know, there are times when I love writing about food. But then...then there are times when stupidity rears its little rat-faced head and I want to take a two-by-four and give it a healthy swat.

I think it's safe to say that we can call the USDA (that'd be the United States Department of Agriculture) a bunch of incompetents. I think it's clear that the folks in charge of that organization have higher priorities than keeping us citizens safely fed, or even protecting farms and farm workers. Or should I say non-corporate farms and farm workers?

Let's mark off what the USDA has been able to accomplish this past year...

  • Allow mass-production feedlot only dairies to wear the organic label upon their milk - Check and Check
  • Ease rules intended to prevent the spread of mad-cow disease - Check
  • Delay announcing positive Mad Cow finding - Check
  • Completely mishandle the testing of the latest cattle found with Mad Cow - Check
  • Appointed a General Mills bureaucrat as "Consumer Representative" to the National Organic Standards Board - Check
  • Failed to regulate field trials of genetically engineered crops adequately - Check

With this track record, it shouldn't come as any surprise that it has now been found that the USDA has blocked real investigations of anti-competitive behavior in the livestock industry, while at the same time inflating the number of investigations it has conducted to make it appear it is vigorously upholding the law.

Not only have they been inflating numbers, but some have outright made stuff up.

Employees created the appearance of a high rate of enforcement by logging routine letters and reviews of public data as investigations, according to a report Wednesday by the agency's inspector general.

Can the USDA provide ANY evidence of things that went right last year? Or are they the second most inept agency in the Federal government, second only to FEMA?

(Thanks to Derrick over at Growers and Grocers for the Heads up)

Technorati Tags: , ,


Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Nicholas Caratzas [Visitor]
I think it's safe to say that we can call the USDA (that'd be the United States Department of Agriculture) a bunch of incompetents.
I hate to disagree with you, Kate, but I'm afraid that the USDA may be too competent.

As you've pointed out, they have "higher priorities than keeping us citizens safely fed." Well, don't forget that, with the exception of the Food Safety and Inspection Service, the USDA isn't a public health agency; their main mission is to promote U.S. agriculture. Heck, even their Customer Statement addresses farmers and ranchers directly, and not consumers.

The FDA has a long history of putting grower/producer interests ahead of the general public's. Remember the old Food Pyramid's nutritionally-questionable assertions -- all complex carbohydrates are equally good, everybody should consume lots of dairy products, fatty proteins just as good for you as lean ones? Well, the wheat, potato, milk and beef industries thought it was just peachy.

And don't forget that the USDA is only responsible for inspecting meat, poultry and eggs. Most other food products are inspected by the FDA, which is directly charged with protecting public health. What this means is that the USDA inspection program as implemented supports the agricultural industry by providing a level of confidence for the consumer; any public health benefits are a beneficial side effect. I'm not sure this was the intent of the Progressive-era legislation establishing food inspections but I know that the situation predates the current administration by decades.

I believe that if you cornered the head of the USDA and demanded an honest assessment of the past year you would get the answer that everything went according to plan. I don't know how we go about improving things, or even if that's possible short of a major change in Washington, but I suspect the USDA's institutional history and culture is such that we'd need to charge an agency like the CPSC or the US Public Health Service with the job.
PermalinkPermalink 01/20/06 @ 01:54
Comment from: Nicholas Caratzas [Visitor]
Ack! Didn't close the italics after too competent! Man, that hurts to read (sorry... :( )
PermalinkPermalink 01/20/06 @ 01:56

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
What color is a red balloon?