Poll

What was your favorite Breakfast Cereal as a child?

View Results

Whiskey Book

First Draft - Research
100% complete

Second Draft
102% complete

Third Draft
99% complete

Panic! No! Don't Panic! What is the "Mad Cow" issue?

06/27/05 @ 07:32:31 am, by Kate Hopkins Email 448 views • Categories: Food, Beef, Food Politics, Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (Mad cow)

As politically savvy as I may or may not be, I actually do not like writing about food politics all that much, in large part because it's so blessedly depressing. If one likes hot dogs, it's best if one does not learn how hot dogs are actually made. If I had my druthers, I'd be writing about Mojito's and omakase.

But alas, beef is not only food, but a food I happen to enjoy on occaission, so I find myself as a vested participant in this whole "Mad Cow" episode. As such, let me cut straight to two points here:

- It's not time to get upset about our meat supply, yet.

- That being said, it's perfectly okay to be upset at how the USDA has handled issues surrounding BSE (aka Mad Cow).

These two points are intertwined with one another. The reason we shouldn't panic about our meat supply (yet) is due to the fact that we simply do not know how prevelant BSE is within our cattle population. It could simply be two cows, or it could be hundreds or thousands. We just don't know.

Why we don't know falls explicitly at the feet of the folks at the USDA...which is why we should be so pissed at them. They set the regulations for cattle farmings in regard to testing and feeding matters. They can set the guidelines which could help determine just how prevelant (or not) BSE is...but they don't. They can set the guidelines which would put our cattle less at risk...but they don't. There are other important variables involved here, including costs and such, but when you get down to the core failings of the USDA, they've done precious little to help reduce and prevent BSE. However, they've had no problems in telling us that our food is safe. As for how they come to that conclusion is beyond me.

The World Health Organization recommends the following when it comes to preventing the spread of BSE into the human population.

  • - Stop Feeding Infected Animals to Other Animals
  • - Establish Adequate Testing & Surveillance of animals
  • - Stop Feeding Bovine Brains, Eyes, Spinal Cords, & Intestines to People or Livestock
  • - Stop Weaning Calves on Cow's Blood

Of these four recommendations, how many do you suppose the USDA supports?

The answer is none of them.

In fact, recently Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns had made mention of reducing the amount of testing. Of course, this was before this recent USDA fiasco (did you think that they've held Mad Cow press conferences on Friday is a coincidence? Bad news is always delivered on a Friday).

At any rate, the issue here is to focus your anxiety correctly. Worry less about the meat supply (for the moment) and worry far more about how the goofnuts at the USDA are possibly selling out our health interests for short term profits in the cattle industry.

Call your Congresscritters (state and federal) and raise hell.


Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: FutureFoodTVStar [Visitor] · http://futurefoodtvstar.blogspot.com
Congresscritters. That's a new one and I love it.

Unfortunately, most of the time that Congress is in session, many a village is missing its idiot.
PermalinkPermalink 06/27/05 @ 12:00
Comment from: Kate Hopkins [Member] Email · http://www.accidentalhedonist.com
Indeed. Congress folks are half shady and half insane, sometimes both.
PermalinkPermalink 06/27/05 @ 12:12
Comment from: Barbara Fisher [Visitor] · http://www.tigerberries.blogspot.com
Another suggestion: in addition to bugging your Congresstwits, which they deserve, mind you, bug the Secretary of Agriculture, Mike Johanns directly. He deserves being bothered to death.

And--a practical suggestion--see if you can find a local farmer who grows beef. Get to know them. Find out how they slaughter their cattle and how they raise them. And patronize them.

They may have more expensive beef, but really, I see no reason why not to pay a bit more for meat you feel more confident in eating. If it means you eat a little less meat, well, your waistline probably will not suffer and niether will you.

Besides--it will likely taste better.
PermalinkPermalink 06/27/05 @ 12:23
Comment from: Kate Hopkins [Member] Email · http://www.accidentalhedonist.com
Barbara, I Absolutely agree with you on all counts.
PermalinkPermalink 06/27/05 @ 12:32
Comment from: Parke Wilde [Visitor] · http://www.usfoodpolicy.blogspot.com
Your post is nicely balanced. BSE doesn't have me panicked, but the USDA monitoring practices seem outrageous.
PermalinkPermalink 06/27/05 @ 18:46
Comment from: Kate Hopkins [Member] Email · http://www.accidentalhedonist.com
Thanks Parke...like you, BSE far from has me worried, but I cannot believe the chutzpah coming from the USDA and clearly tied they are to the cattle lobby. This whole "less testing, not more" idea strikes me as not ignorant, but arrogant. The entire BSE operation at the USDA has been an unmitigated disaster, and yet no one seems willing to listen to those who have the proof.

PermalinkPermalink 06/28/05 @ 09:54

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
What color is a red balloon?